Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Select and Discuss One of the Topics
A Nervous Experiment
Air Pollution
Manduca Caterpillar Growth Experiment (Full Virtual Lab)
When Water Gets Icy You may select one of the topics listed here to formulate your research question, or you may design a research question of your own using another virtual site or hands-on experiment. If you decide to design your own, you
must receive prior approval from your instructor. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Background Information A. Research Question: Propose a research question that can be answered using the scientific method.
B. Significance: Describe the broader significance of this experiment and its results to the field of biology.
Have similar experiments been conducted? In other words, how does this experiment relate to basic principles of biology and previous experiments? Guidelines for Submission: Submit a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document in an outline format or bulleted list using double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Select and Discuss One of the Topics |
Select and Discuss One of the Topics