Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Question Description
Complete Discussion Question incorporating these notes from the instructor….It is very important to cite in text from the course book as well referenced below.
Instructor comments: While self-injurious behavior is a remote possibility, what I would like for you to do is focus on the details in the vignette to identify a current ethical situation already identified within our case details. How would you utilize the book’s information within your work (using in-text citation) to further your argument?
Discussion Instructions:
Using the vignette (link below) and an ethical decision making model in the Cournoyer textbook, identify at least one ethical dilemma that could present itself in this situation.
Address how you would handle the issue using the Code of Ethics and one of the ethical decision making models presented in the Cournoyer textbook.
Vignette-Nina
Your Tasks:
Make an initial, substantive post of at least 250 – 350 words considering the directions and prompt above.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
self-injurious behavior As a remote possibility |
self-injurious behavior As a remote possibility