Skills Necessary to Develop and Support Written Argument Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Skills Necessary to Develop and Support Written Argument Assignment
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to help students practice the skills necessary to develop and support a written argument. These skills include: (1) Developing a claim that adds to, refutes, expands, or challenges an existing argument, and (2) Integrating quotes in a paper using MLA citation methods.
Task: Your task for this paper is to craft a 4-5page personal argument. You will need to develop a claim about a topic explored in one (or more) of the readings in Technology: A Reader for Writers and support that claim with evidence. You may use any reading from our textbook (available sources in the attachments); no other sources may be used in this paper.
A successful paper will demonstrate a detailed awareness of the position(s) of the author(s) you draw on in your paper, as well as provide sound reasoning and evidence in support of your argument. As part of your claim, you may choose to critique or challenge an author, add to the argument an author makes, or redefine a problem that an author poses.
Skills Necessary to Develop and Support Written Argument Assignment
Summary of Requirements:
- Your paper will need a clearclaim(also known as a thesis statement) that makes an arguable assertion related to a topic from one of the course readings. You may either develop your claim in response to an argument that an author has made in a text or in response to a larger issue that one or more authors from our textbook have addressed.
- To support your assertion, you must use evidence from at least one of our course texts. For that reason, your essay must include three quotes in support of your thesis (one per body paragraph). Remember, a good argument paper uses concise and focused quotes rather than long, purposeless ones. As well, when using evidence from another source in your writing, it is essential to be accurate and fair to the author’s actual point of view.
- As this is a formal academic essay in which you will explore an idea in a focused and cohesive way, your essay should be organizedinto proper paragraphs, with a cohesive and focused introduction, body, and conclusion. As well, each paragraph should focus on only one main idea per paragraph and transitions should be used to connect ideas in the paper.
- Since you will be incorporating quotes and paraphrasing in your essay, you will need to include in-text citations and a works cited page in MLA format. Remember that quotes and paraphrasing should be appropriately integrated into the essay using the ‘quote sandwich’ method.
- Finally, your essay should be formatted in MLA page formattingand utilize academic tone, wording and sentence structure. It should also be polished and free of sentence-level grammar, spelling, or syntactical errors.
Rubric
Claim Paper Evaluation Rubric
Claim Paper Evaluation Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim/Thesis There should be a clear claim (thesis statement) that makes an arguable assertion related to a topic from our course readings.
20.0 pts Outstanding
17.0 pts Strong
15.0 pts Good
12.0 pts Needs Work
0.0 pts Inadequate
20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence The paper should demonstrate a fair and accurate representation of the position(s) of the author(s) you draw on in your paper, as well as provide sound reasoning and evidence in support of the argument. The paper should include at least three substantially discussed quotes from one or more texts from our course textbook.
25.0 pts Outstanding
21.5 pts Strong
19.0 pts Good
15.0 pts Needs Work
0.0 pts Inadequate
25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization The essay should be organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Paragraphs should be focused. There should be one substantial piece of evidence in support of the argument per body paragraph and clear transitions between ideas.
20.0 pts Outstanding
17.0 pts Strong
15.0 pts Good
12.0 pts Needs Work
0.0 pts Inadequate
20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References There should be parenthetical citations following all quotes and paraphrases. Quotes should be integrated appropriately into the essay. There should be a works cited page at the end of the paper.
20.0 pts Outstanding
17.0 pts Strong
15.0 pts Good
12.0 pts Needs Work
0.0 pts Inadequate
20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Formatting and Mechanics The sentence-level writing should be clear and without grammatical, mechanical, or spelling errors. The paper should be formatted according to MLA page formatting.
15.0 pts Outstanding
13.0 pts Strong
11.0 pts Good
9.0 pts Needs Work
0.0 pts Inadequate
15.0 pts Total Points: 100.0
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Skills Necessary to Develop and Support Written Argument Assignment