SOC 205 Judicial Decision-Making Society Law Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
SOC 205 Judicial Decision-Making Society Law Discussion
Part 1:
“Influences on Judicial Decision Making” In great detail, please respond to the following:
Attorney Joe Smith has established regular interactions with many of the local judges in the town where his practice is located and has built
professional relationships with them. Discuss at least two (2) advantages that Joe’s professional relationships would afford him if he wants to
postpone a case until a more favorable judge is available. Provide a rationale for your response.
Given the discussion on legal subcultures in Chapter 12 of the text, identify at least two (2) of the relative strengths and weaknesses found in legal
subcultures. Describe the primary reasons why you believe your chosen attributes aid in the decision-making process of court systems. Provide a
rationale for your response. SOC 205 Judicial Decision-Making Society Law Discussion
Note: Chapter’s 12 reading section is in attachments.
Part 2: Briefly respond to a peer’s post:
Peer’s Post: “Hi Classmate and prof.
A judge’s decision-making is influence by localisms, organization affiliation, and spiritual beliefs. Localisms controls some judge’s choices as a
result of they’ll have mature up with robust traditions with historical ties. Others could have matured up poor, and that they wish to grant back to
their community, or the region of their courts. they’re radio-controlled by their organization affiliation as a result of some return from socially
outstanding families of public service and visited prestigious law colleges. Others could have robust political theories on economic, criminal, or
civil liberty problems.
Sometimes, faith can have an effect on a judge’s angle, however, will not have an effect on their job performance as a result of they have to rule on
i feel these influences area unit most influential to the method as a result of consistency, fairness, and responsibility is everything once individuals’
area unit seeking justice. There ought to be a balance to protect the mental health of the legal proceedings to avoid typically stirring sick feelings
from the public’s reception. 2 benefits Joe has suspended a case until a lot of favorable choose is out there as a result of Joe has established an
excellent name and respect for operating onerous at intervals the court and he is aware of the choices are going to be a lot of favorable or lenient
towards his shopper.
A legal social group could be a combination of rules and practices that aid in decision-making hotels in a court setting. it’s the basis of a higher
cognitive process in a very court setting. it’s a basis of higher cognitive process that focuses on;
1) the character of legal reasoning,
2) adherence to precedence, and
3) constraints unproved choose higher cognitive process. The legal social group sets a pattern of legal reasoning by checking on the similarity of
2 cases and introducing the rule of law in each case. For adherence to precedence, the philosophical system of stare decisions is employed
creating the choice to create a choice supported precedence. Are setting constraints unproved to choose higher cognitive process answers
queries such as; is there a case of difference or have all the remedies been exhausted? The perform is to take advantage of consultative opinions
to make sure correct case standing.
The legal social group has its strengths and weaknesses too. First, the advantage is that it utilizes all remedies and consultation’s opinions to
create choices. Second, it employs the rule of law in creating judgments. The weaknesses embody the utilization of precedence to create choices
creating it polemically. correct consultation and the rule of law aid in creating credible rulings and deciding victimization stare decisions raises
several queries and so polemical.
Peer ”
SOC 205 Judicial Decision-Making Society Law Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
SOC 205 Judicial Decision-Making Society Law Discussion