Social and Behavioral Sciences Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Social and Behavioral Sciences Assignment
This required Portfolio assignment will provide you with the opportunity to practice and hone your research skills. It has been designed to help you think scientifically about real world problems and issues and to apply your knowledge of the research process to various topics in Psychology. This assignment accomplishes that goal by challenging you to:
- Differentiate between the common use of the word research and the use of the word research in the social and behavioral sciences
- Identify the major steps in the research process using a classic study in Psychology as an example.
Part I: Defining Research
The word research is used in many different ways. Consider the following examples:
- Your friend tells you that he intends to research different hair products before deciding on one to buy.
- A real estate agent advises you to research home values in your neighborhood before putting your house on the market.
- A police officer reports that she is doing ‘some research’ on possible motives for a crime that was committed.
- A writer states that he does ‘extensive research’ before beginning his fictional works.
Answer the questions below:
- How is research defined in the social and behavioral sciences?
- What makes scientific research different from the examples provided above? In your response, be sure to address the characteristics of ‘good’ psychological research.
Part II: Understanding the research process
Researchers in Psychology follow a systematic process of investigation. Carefully read Chapter 2 of your textbook, paying special attention to the section on Experimental Research. Then go to Chapter 7 in your textbook and read the following section: Research In-Depth: Counterfactuals and “If only…” Thinking. Answer the questions below, using Medvec & colleagues’ first study as an example:
- What hypothesis did Medvec & colleagues set out to test in their first study of the ‘near miss’ phenomenon? Describe the theory associated with this hypothesis.
- Identify the variables in the study and describe how they were measured. How did the researchers operationalize (test or measure) affective response upon winning a bronze or silver medal?
- Who were the participants in the study and what did they do?
- Describe the data that were collected and analyzed.
- Describe the results of the study. What did the researchers conclude?
- If you were to design a follow-up experiment on this subject, what might it be?
Mental Treatment Illness
- Discuss how the methods of treating mental illness have changed over the years. How is mental health viewed now compared to how it was viewed in pre-modern societies?
2. What is managed care and how did it come to exist? How do you feel about managed care? Provide evidence supporting your opinion.
3. Using the ebrary section of the CSU Online Library, locate the following book:
Clinical Case Formulation: Varieties of Approaches edited by Peter Sturmey.
Once you have located the book, read Chapter 6, pp. 85-92. The title of this chapter is “Zeppi: A Case of Psychosis” and was written by Anthony Dimech, David Kingdon, and Maged Swelam.
As you learned in Chapter 7, behavior leads to the label of mental illness when it violates cognitive norms, performance norms, and feeling norms. Identify the existence of each of these norms within the case study, and discuss what causes it to be distinguished as such.
4.Do you believe that there actually is a crisis in health care in the United States? Why, or why not? Give evidence to support your answer.Social and Behavioral Sciences Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow