Social Enterprise in The Nonprofit Sector Discussion Term Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Social Enterprise in The Nonprofit Sector Discussion Term Paper
Reading: Nonprofit Management, Principles and Practice: Chapters 14-16
Required Reading
Consider the lessons offered in these two articles, which revisit social enterprise and social impact bonds, two models that were launched with high expectations, but are now being critiqued as too simplistic to address complex social problems.
Marshall Ganz, Tamara Kay & Jason Spicer,Social Enterprise Is Not Social Change, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring 2018.
Nadine Paquenza, The Downside of Social Impact Bonds, Stanford Social Innovation Review, May 31, 201
UTEC runs multiple successful social enterprise models. Now that you’re familiar with the social enterprise concept and critiques, take a look at them and consider how UTEC’s strengths in Relevance and Impact feed into the success of their social enterprises and Sustainability.
Question
: What do you think made models such as social enterprise and social impact bonds so appealing when they were initially introduced? How do you account for when they have worked and not worked? What are your most important take-aways from the lessons learned?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Social Enterprise in The Nonprofit Sector Discussion Term Paper
Social Enterprise in The Nonprofit Sector Discussion Term Paper