Social Justice and Human Rights Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Social Justice and Human Rights Essay
Reading Responses
Due at start of class
Students are required to write 10 reading response papers, each worth 2.5 marks, which adds up to a 25% of the final grade. These assignments are due at the start of the class and they concern the readings for that class. For instance, the reading response for the readings on May 8 (Hobbes & Locke) are due at the start of the class on May 8. The reading responses are intended to be short exercises that get you to do the reading before class and to start thinking about the reading before we discuss it in class. Accordingly, you should write roughly 500 words and you should respond to the set of readings as a whole. That is, for May 8, you respond to Hobbes and Locke in one response rather than in two separate responses. The reading responses are intended to be more than a mere summary (they said this, then they said that, and then they said this again), but less than an essay (you are not making an argument). What you are doing is recording your response to the readings. Thus, I am looking for you to say what you found interesting (or uninteresting) in them, what you found important (or unimportant) in them, what you understood (or didn’t understand) in them, any comments or observations you have about them, and, possibly, connections you see between different sets of readings or how connections between the readings and the “real world.” The reading responses are not intended to be “formal” assignments in the sense that you have an introduction, conclusion, and argument in the middle, but they should be “formal” in the sense that they ought to be written in coherent English. It is not absolutely necessary that they be in prose form; but don’t just jot down a few unconnected bullet points. Late responses will not be accepted. Because things happen, you can submit one—but only one—response paper to me by e-mail, but it must be in PDF format and it must be received as close as possible to the start of class. Additionally, we have eleven classes with readings, but you are only required to write ten responses; this means that you can miss one set of readings without penalty.
Home>Business & Finance homework help>Marketing homework help>read the attachment
Write a 2 to 3 page paper based on Knowledge sharing within two (2) companies.
Comparing their transfer of knowledge.
Idea sharing, within the company from top-to-down and vice versa.
The purpose of sharing the information: I.E at General Electric, they share information, for the purpose of replicating another manager, within 2 years of the employees arrival, therefore the current manager must share information with his predecessor.
Find the purpose of sharing.
Pick any two companies and compare their reasons for knowledge sharing, how they share the knowledge and why?
The company’s have to be different company’s who are not in the same field. Eg. An accounting firm and an electrical company.
Compare the mediums which each company shares information, whether through memo’s or emails.
Focus on there knowledge sharing, how its done, why it done. The differences.
These must be real companies. Based on actual facts.
Social Justice and Human Rights Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow