Social Science Psychodynamic theory Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Social Science Psychodynamic theory Paper
The theories/modalities you can select from for Paper 1 are:
Strengths Perspective
Ecological Systems
Psychodynamic
CBTIn addition to an introduction and conclusion, the outline you should use for the discussion papers is as follows:
- Theory/Modality: Identify and describe the theory/modality you have selected, including historical figures in its development and key elements of the theory. Explain it as if the reader has never heard of this before.
- Laura’s Intervention: Describe the specific steps of how a social work practitioner would use this model to intervene with Laura. Be as detailed as possible about which of Laura’s concerns would be addressed and what the social worker would do to apply this theory/modality to help Laura.
- Analysis: Summarize the strengths and limitations of this approach. Which aspects of the model would be most helpful, and why (or why not)? Use the literature to support your statements regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
Include comprehensive, clear, and accurate summary of the historical development and key elements of the theory or intervention
Demonstrate critical thinking and accurate understanding of the theory by applying it to help Laura. Provide detailed and specific examples of how to use this theory/modality with Laura.
Summarize the strengths and limitations of this approach, both in general and with Laura specifically.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Social Science Psychodynamic theory Paper
Social Science Psychodynamic theory Paper