Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Sociological and Theoretical Analysis and Reflection of Film Theme
Sociological Reflection/Insight Rubric
Point Total: 48-50
Responsiveness to Topics and Questions: Clearly addresses all topics and responds effectively and thoroughly to all aspects of the assignment
Sociological/Theoretical analysis and Reflection: explores the issues showing thorough reflection and understanding of connections between personal experience, course content and film’s theme; effectively seeks to understand concepts and course material by critically examining possible relationships between material and film content
Use of Film Details/Examples: Rich supporting details relating film content to course that enhance the effectiveness of communication; ideas supported by apt evidence/examples; is coherently and logically organized
Organization: Is coherently and logically organized (i.e. stays on target with the topic); expresses logical progression between ideas; careful and effective transitions
Control of Mechanics, Paper Length and Proper References: Is generally free from errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure Paper meets length requirements & material needing citation is appropriately cited
Point Total: 45-47:
Responsiveness to Topics and Questions: Clearly addresses all topics, by may respond to some aspects of the assignment more effectively and thoroughly than others, but still demonstrates a clear understanding of requirements.
Sociological/Theoretical analysis and Reflection: demonstrates depth and complexity in exploring the issues while showing some reflection and understanding of connections between personal experience, course content and film’s theme, but may be somewhat limited; response shows evidence of synthesis and sociological/theoretical knowledge, but it is somewhat limited
Use of Film Details/Examples: Details are specific and relevant to course material, while also enhancing the effectiveness of communication. Use of appropriate reasoning and examples is present, but limited.
Organization: Is well organized; relationships among ideas is assisted by transitions and logical progression of ideas
Control of Mechanics, Paper Length and Proper References: May have a few errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure; Paper meets length requirements & material needing citation is appropriately cited
Point Total: 40-44:
Responsiveness to Topics and Questions: Clearly addresses all topics, but may respond to some aspects of the assignment more effectively and thoroughly than others
Sociological/Theoretical analysis and Reflection: may treat the topic simplistically or repetitively, but still demonstrates sufficient and/or deep reflection and/or analysis; seeks to under concepts by examining relationships in simplistic (unidirectional) ways.
Use of Film Details/Examples: Details are adequate and relevant; claims and observations are mostly supported with reasons and adequate examples, but may be limited in their application.
Organization: is adequately organized; relationships among ideas are mostly clear, but may be conveyed inconsistently at times.
Control of Mechanics, Paper Length and Proper References: May have some errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure, but generally demonstrates control of all; Paper may only meet either length requirements or citation of material/references.
Point Total: 35-39:
Responsiveness to Topics and Questions: indicates some confusion about the topics or neglects important aspects of the assignment; doesn’t answer all questions and slights some aspects of the assignment
Sociological/Theoretical analysis and Reflection: clearly lacks some focus and demonstrates confused or simplistic thinking; may fail to communicate ideas effectively; response shows little evidence of synthesis or personalization of ideas, insights gained or hoped for as a result of watching the film are unclear or limited.
Use of Film Details/Examples: Details may lack elaboration and are not clearly related to course material; important details and support in the form of examples are underdeveloped.
Organization: May be poorly organized and points jump around-lacks logical presentation; relationships between ideas is presented.
Control of Mechanics, Paper Length and Proper References: May be marred by an accumulation of errors in mechanics, usage and sentence structure; paper may only meet either the required length or citations of references.
Point Total: 30-34:
Responsiveness to Topics and Questions: indicates confusion about the topics or neglects important aspects of the assignment
Sociological/Theoretical analysis and Reflection: clearly lacks focus, demonstrates confused or simplistic thinking or fails to communicate ideas effectively; response shows little to no evidence of synthesis or personalization of ideas, insights gained or hoped for as a result of watching the film are unclear or limited.
Use of Film Details/Examples: Details lack elaboration and are not clearly related to course material; important details and support in the form of examples are underdeveloped.
Organization: May be poorly organized and points jump around-lacks logical presentation; relationships between ideas is presented.
Control of Mechanics, Paper Length and Proper References: Is marred by an accumulation of errors in mechanics, usage and sentence structure; paper may only meet either the required length or citations of references.
Point Total: 29 and Below:
Responsiveness to Topics and Questions: Suggests an inability to comprehend the assignment or to respond meaningfully to the topics.
Sociological/Theoretical analysis and Reflection: Is superficial, demonstrates no reflection, shows no relevant analysis. Response shows no evidence of synthesis or personalization of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the film or course content.
Use of Film Details/Examples: Few relevant, course-related details are present; examples and evidence is absent.
Organization: Ideas are presented in an unrelated, illogical way; difficult to follow author’s thought process
Control of Mechanics, Paper Length and Proper References: Has serious and persistent
errors in word choice, mechanics, usage, and sentence structure Paper does not meet length and is missing necessary citations
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Sociological and Theoretical Analysis and Reflection of Film Theme |
Sociological and Theoretical Analysis and Reflection of Film Theme