Soil classification systems and mapping
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Soil classification systems and mapping
Soil classification systems are used to group soils based on their properties, such as texture, structure, mineralogy, and organic matter content. These systems are important for understanding the characteristics and behavior of soils in different environments and for managing soil resources for various purposes, including agriculture, forestry, engineering, and environmental protection.
There are several soil classification systems in use around the world, but one of the most widely recognized and adopted is the Soil Taxonomy system developed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). This system categorizes soils into hierarchical levels based on diagnostic features, such as soil horizons, color, texture, and mineralogy. The highest level of the classification is the soil order, which reflects the dominant properties and processes of the soil. The second level is the suborder, followed by the great group, subgroup, family, and series. The lower levels of the classification are increasingly specific and localized, reflecting the variation in soil properties within a given area.
Soil mapping is the process of creating spatial representations of soil properties and their distribution in the landscape. Soil maps are important tools for land use planning, soil conservation, environmental assessment, and natural resource management. Soil mapping can be done using various methods, including field surveys, remote sensing, and digital soil mapping techniques.
Field surveys involve physically sampling and analyzing soils in the field, using tools such as augers, soil probes, and laboratory analysis. The data collected from field surveys are used to create soil maps based on the properties of the sampled soils and their spatial distribution.
Remote sensing involves using satellite or airborne sensors to gather information about the reflectance or emission of energy from the earth’s surface. The data collected from remote sensing can be used to identify and map soil properties, such as texture, moisture, and vegetation cover.
Digital soil mapping is a relatively new approach that involves using statistical models and geographic information systems (GIS) to create soil maps based on environmental variables, such as climate, geology, topography, and land use. Digital soil mapping can produce more accurate and detailed soil maps than traditional methods, but it requires extensive data collection and analysis.
In conclusion, soil classification systems and mapping are essential tools for understanding and managing soil resources. Soil classification systems provide a framework for categorizing and describing soils based on their properties and behavior, while soil mapping provides spatial representations of soil properties and their distribution in the landscape. These tools can help guide land use planning, soil conservation, and environmental management practices to ensure the sustainable use and protection of soil resources.
Soil classification systems and mapping
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow