solid financial investment company discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
solid financial investment company discussion
By the due date assigned, submit your assignment to the Submissions Area.
solid financial investment company discussion
For your course project, do the following:
- Combine all of the analysis from the discussions into an executive summary not to exceed one page.
- Follow that with 3 pages of narrative discussing your analysis and summarizing your opinion of the financial health of the 3 companies – Subway, Chipole, Panda Express
- Describe the three ratio categories.
- Explain the financial ratios calculated.
- Work in the answers to the questions from your Module 4discussion:
- Which company is more liquid?
- Which company has the strongest net income?
- Which company has the strongest solvency?
- Which company is most profitable?
- Which company would be the most solid financial investment?
- Conclude with a summary of your findings and a recommendation, with supporting evidence, identifying which company is the most solid financial investment.
- Include an abstract at the beginning of your paper.
- Be sure to format your paper and cite any sources using APA style.
- You may use this APA Citation Helperas a guide.
- This APA formatting handoutwill help you set up your essay using APA style.
Save your paper as a Microsoft Word document named LastnameFirst Initial_ACC201_M5A2. By the due date assigned, submit your document to the Submissions Area.
solid financial investment company discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results