Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Source Comparison for English 111 Health Issue
Unit 3 Discussion (Part 1)
Instructions
Consider a health topic that interests you. Then, go to the government websites listed below and investigate each one for information on the health topic you’ve chosen.
(If you don’t get any results, change your topicfine.) it’s Look at each webpage.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a U.S. government agency that works to (Links to an external site.)
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a federal agency that researches (Links to an external site.)
The World Health Organization (WHO) is an international organization that promotes (Links to an external site.)
Compare and contrast your search results in your first article.
What kind of information was available on each website?
What was the information’s resemblance? What made it unique?
What can you deduce about each of these organizations’ goal or mission?
What did you learn about the issue that you didn’t know before?
What surprised you or seemed unexpected?
Please be careful to back up your claims and thoughts using APA-style citations and references.
Instructions (Part 2)
Resources to Research and Compare
Source Comparison is the title of the evaluation.
This assignment will allow you to thoroughly examine two different resource types in order to improve your understanding of how to choose the best resource type for your information needs. This task is divided into three sections. Part 1 will have you reading an article from the internet and answering questions about it. You’ll read a scholarly article and answer questions about it in Part 2. Part 3 asks you to summarize your experience and compare and contrast the two sources of information.
1st part
Check out the post 9 Things I’ve Learned About Feeding Kids for more information.
Please answer the following questions:
What do you think the target audience for this article is?
What is the goal of this piece?
Briefly summarize the article by stating the author’s major points.
Give this information source an APA reference entry.
Part two
Next, read the article Challenges and Facilitators to Promoting a Healthy Food Environment and Communicating Effectively with Parents to Improve School Children’s Food Behaviors in a scientific publication.
Please respond to the following inquiries:
What do you think the target audience for this article is?
What is the goal of this piece?
Look over the bibliography at the end of the essay. Please explain how these references aid your assessment of the source’s reliability.
Give this information source an APA reference entry.
3rd installment
Compare and contrast the two sources of information in this summary question. What is the difference between the information in the USNews.com article and the information in the scholarly journal article? What would you do with each type of data? Finally, explain what you believe to be the most essential lesson you learnt from this project.
Your assignment should be submitted as a Word document that follows all of the above directions and follows all APA formatting guidelines. Make sure you proofread your work.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Source Comparison for English 111 Health Issue |
Source Comparison for English 111 Health Issue