SPED 620 Early Intervention Critical Analysis Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
SPED 620 Early Intervention Critical Analysis Case Study
Guidelines – Zika Virus
Students will read/view a variety of different sources about Zika Virus (e.g. research articles, newspaper articles, podcasts, videos, etc.) and engage in discussion/activities about each assigned topic.
Students will evaluate the quality of scientific information and analyze the connection of scientific research and application to personal, social or ethical issues in the modern world (i.e., Early Intervention, Environmental Sustainability and/or Social Justice).
Students will then complete a written critique and reflection for 3 different case studies. Papers should be 3 pages in length, using APA format. Students can earn up to 30 points each paper, per the following:
Summary of Topic – 5 points (approximately 1 page)
- Provide a brief summary of the environmental risk factor (i.e., the topic): 2 points
- Explain what the impact is on perinatal and early development: 2 points
- Describe any treatment or other recommendations: 1 point
Critique of Current Scientific Evidence – 10 points (approximately 1 page)
- Briefly review the current research on the topic; what are the major findings?: 2 points
- Provide your own analysis of the quality of the existing research; what are the strengths and weaknesses?: 5 points
- Share your recommendations for future studies; what are the priorities?: 3 points
Application and Reflection – 10 points (approximately 1 page)
- Apply the information about the topic to the field of Early Intervention; what is the impact on young children and families?: 4 points
- Reflect individually on what you’ve learned; what are the personal, social and ethical issues this topic raises for you?: 3 points
- What are the implications for the field of Early Intervention, policy-makers, global leaders, etc.?: 3 points
Format and Proofread – 5 points
- 3 double-spaced pages: 1 point
- APA format, including in-text citations and reference page: 2 points
- Written in a professional manner and is thoroughly edited: 1 point
- *Please read example and don’t plagiarism!
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow SPED 620 Early Intervention Critical Analysis Case Study