Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Sprint Backlog Project Case Study Assignment Paper
Select a subset of Items from your Product Backlog (see Schedule 3) for your Sprint Backlog ( I upload Schedule 3)
List at least two (2) tasks for each Item selected in your Sprint Backlog
Assign “ideal hours” for each task.
Ideal hours is the time it would take to complete the task without any interruptions or unplanned issues. Note: A task should a minimum of 1 hour and a maximum of 8-12 hours, that is, no more than what 1 or 2 individuals can complete in a single day. If your task is > 12 hours, it should be broken down into smaller tasks so that this limit isn’t exceeded.
Assume that 5 days (out of 10 days total) of your Sprint has passed
Complete a Task Board – move tasks (“Status”) to show hypothetical work completed during that time, based on the anticipated work output of your team members.
Assume some tasks are “In progress” and that one or more tasks are complete (“Verify” or “Done”).
Update the Burndown chart (under the “Burndown” tab).
Note: Story Points (“Points”) are only added once all tasks for a Sprint Backlog Item are complete; points accumulate each day; since we assume that 5 days have passed, only data for 5 days should be entered – leave cells blank for days that haven’t happened
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Sprint Backlog Project Case Study Assignment Paper |