Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations
(3) Client CEO Memo
Along with your teammates, you have now completed a simulated consulting project for a major public company of your choice – and you have delivered your team’s presentation. As a final step in the process, you have individually been asked to draft a follow-up memo to the CEO. The memo should take note of the team’s key findings and recommendations, and it should add further reflections that have occurred to you personally during and since the simulated final presentation meeting with the CEO [Up to 600 words]. Please check on the Client CEO Memo Company Background subfolder for the selected firm – so you could see the details and the company solution we proposed.
(4) Analysis of the Consulting Industry
Our Class #6 discussion focuses on the enduring strength and continuing growth of the consulting industry, and on the disruptive challenges that it needs to address. You have been asked by an investment firm to evaluate the attractiveness of the leading consulting firms from a strategic and financial standpoint. Citing your reading and observations from the class discussion, write a short assessment of the current state of the industry. Please address this question: Would you be a buyer or seller of notional consulting industry shares – and why?
Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow