Survey Results for the Modified Work Schedule Option
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Survey Results for the Modified Work Schedule Option
NOTE: Results for each question are shown in red.
A modified work schedule is a good option. Choose one.
16 Strongly agree
42 Agree
18 Neutral
6 Disagree
3 Strongly Disagree
If a modified work schedule option were offered, which options would you prefer? Choose one.
8 No change
25 Four 10-hour days per week
26 Nine 9-hour days per two-week period
26 Five 8-hour days per week, with flexible start and end times
Survey Results for the Modified Work Schedule Option
If a revised work schedule resulting in a long weekend were implemented, would you be willing to come in on your day off to handle special meetings or crises?
14 yes
71 no
Survey Results for the Modified Work Schedule Option
Survey Monkey® was used to develop an anonymous online survey to assess worker preferences concerning revised work schedules. The survey link was sent to all 100 employees in the company. A total of 85 employees responded to the survey.
Of the 85 respondents, approximately half are female and half are male. About 10 percent of the respondents are 51-70 years old; 45 percent are 35-50 years old; 30 percent are 25-34 years old, and the rest are between the ages of 18 and 24.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Survey Results for the Modified Work Schedule Option