System Integration and Test assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
System Integration and Test assignment
The paper should be a maximum of 10 pages single-spaced, including the cover sheet with your name, class, date, course and section number, etc; this is a maximum page count—it can be less. Use suitable fonts no smaller than 12 point (except perhaps for footnotes, references, etc.). Use at least 1-inch margins all around. Note: all graphics and
charts, if any, should be incorporated (inserted) directly into your paper (on a Word page) seamlessly, not attached separately in a different format or embedded in a program
icon. The paper and all charts should form a single, continuous Word document (and print out as such). Number your answers to match the numbered questions. All of your
work must be your own. Show how you calculated numerical solutions, if any, and cite references for quoted or paraphrased material.
(1) In the future, imagine the commercial production of large, complex systems for obtaining energy from laser-induced fusion, i.e., a laser fusion reactor (using either inertial confinement fusion or magnetic confinement fusion). Based on the way we have learned VVT methodology is tailored according to the system’s size, complexity, and type, and extrapolated to the hypothetical laser fusion reactor, describe how the VVT methodology might be tailored for the production of these systems.
(2) Describe the typical life cycle of an unmanned air vehicle, such as the Predator or Reaper.
(3) Assume that the system of interest is a prototype solar-powered car, i.e., a small, lightweight car that seats two and is covered with efficient solar cells that are connected to a battery to store the electrical energy from the solar cells, and from which the vehicle obtains all of its energy. Design and describe a demonstration of this system that is the functional equivalent of testing it.
(4) For the solar-powered car in Question 3 above, define how you would evaluate each of the following metrics for product quality:
(a) Performance (how well does the product or service do what it is supposed to do)
(b) Aesthetics (appearance, feel, smell, taste)
(c) Conformance (how well does the product or service correspond to the customer’s expectations)
(d) Safety (risk of injury or harm)
(e) Reliability (consistent performance)
(f) Durability (useful life)
(5) Provide examples of six systems where destructive testing is performed during VVT, and explain for each example why the destructive testing is needed and what it accomplishes
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow System Integration and Test assignment