Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
“Format and Style for Professionals”
It doesn’t matter how you do something; it doesn’t matter how you do everything. T. Harv Eker (T. Harv Eker, T. Harv Eker, T. (from Secrets of the Millionaire Mind)
This course combines the acquisition of a new format (business style) with the adaptation of your English language skills to a new audience. Format (how you communicate) and substance (what you discuss) are both important in business communication (what you say).
To each of the following questions, write an original response of 5-7 sentences. Try to post early in the week and thoughtfully respond to at least one classmate’s post. ** A total of 30 points are awarded for each weekly discussion. Take your time and provide as much information and detail as possible. **
Discuss how the Eker quote relates to your professional experience and the Week 2 material.
In corporate communication, especially emails, how important is it to use proper language, spelling, and punctuation? Do you double-check your emails (or texts) before sending them?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Technical Professional Communications Discussion |
Technical Professional Communications Discussion