The Body Composition Interpretation of Lab Report
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
The Body Composition Interpretation of Lab Report
This assignment requires Level 1 Writing Guidelines.Answer the following questions:
Was the predicted body fat in the Body Composition Lab (Proc #1) close to the actual body fat measured (Proc #4)? Why or why not? (2 points)
Discuss any differences in classifications of overweight, obese, or increased health risk amongst the tests. (2 pts)
After calculating BMI, BFS, waist to hip ratio, and skin fold measurements, create a list of potential health risks associated with the individuals you measured based on the lab results. (3 points)
Establish suggested specific dietary approaches to limit disease processes for one of the subjects measured. Be sure to review your book in regards to the side effects associated with low carb, high protein, or other dangerous diets (5 points)
Choose a subject from lab that was classified as overweight or obese based upon your results. Which principles of weight control (behavior modification, rate of weight loss, suggested daily calorie intake, and exercise regimen) would you recommend? If none of your subjects was overweight, you can create a theoretical individual to use as an example (5 points)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Body Composition Interpretation of Lab Report
The Body Composition Interpretation of Lab Report