Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The Case Biology question’s facts
You will provide the facts of the case and the conclusions you have reached as part of this conversation. You’ll then be able to check if others who are looking into the same case and evidence agree with your analysis of the evidence and findings.
Post Requirements: This assignment calls for two posts, each of which must be completed separately.
DUE THURSDAY FOR THE FIRST POST
What is your theory about the assailant’s identity? What happened to Chelsie Vapolt, in your opinion?
What evidence do you have to back this up, including the timing, autopsy, hair analysis, body fluids, blood, and DNA?
What evidence from the timeline, autopsy, hair analysis, bodily fluids, blood, and DNA do you have that would point to a different suspect(s)?
Which of the case’s facts are you certain of? Which do you believe to be true but have no proof to back it up?
DUE SUNDAY FOR THE SECOND POST
Please read the posts and answer to one of your classmates’ posts. Try to respond to someone who hasn’t gotten back to you yet.
Do you have the same theories about who killed the person? If that’s not the case, what’s your theory?
Examine the evidence and facts they’ve presented. Which of the following do you agree with? Which ones do you disagree with (if any)? Explain your reasons for full credit.
Select one piece of proof. Other than murder, what is a possible innocent or alternate explanation for this evidence being discovered where it was?
An orange cat hair was detected on the victim’s coat since the suspect owns an orange cat. However, the victim’s next-door neighbor had an orange cat as well. As a result, the cat hair could have come from the next-door neighbor’s cat.
Grading
Click the three dots in the upper right corner of this page, then “Show Rubric” to see how this work will be evaluated. The rubric is featured in the Grade tab if you’re reviewing this assignment using the Canvas mobile app.
While I’m not evaluating you on your spelling or language, scientific communication is a valuable skill. Before posting or uploading, please proofread and spellcheck to ensure that your ideas are clear. Excessive grammar and spelling issues that detract from the readability of your work may result in a 10% deduction.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
The Case Biology question’s facts |
The Case Biology question’s facts