Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:’
The Disqualification of Human Nature Essay’s Fundamental Statement
Examine the international realism hypothesis. What are the classical and neorealism’s tenets? What distinguishes realism from other global theories like liberalism, constructivism, and Marxism? What are some of the realism’s detractors? What additional philosophies do you think attack realism? Is it true that these criticisms are valid or not? Is the record of significant events in the history of international politics supportive or contradictory to realism’s claims (provide specific
examples)? Is there any other theory that better explains the reality than realism? Why do you think that is? Discuss
Your essay should be 5 pages long, Times New Roman 12 font, double-spaced, and formatted in MLA format (not including work cited)
At least two outside sources should be used.
Include a page for works cited.
At least once throughout your essay, you should cite the textbook. Joshua S. Goldstein and Jon C. W. Pevehouse’s 11th edition is titled International Relations.
The book can be found here 🙂
https://fliphtml5.com/gtglr/pjiz/basic
I’ve also included a copy of my professor’s ppt for chapter 2:D
The Disqualification of Human Nature Essay’s Fundamental Statement
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 Â points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 Â points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 Â points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
The Disqualification of Human Nature Essay’s Fundamental Statement |
The Disqualification of Human Nature Essay’s Fundamental Statement