The effects of agricultural burning on air pollution
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The effects of agricultural burning on air pollution
Agricultural burning, also known as stubble burning or field burning, is the practice of setting fire to crops or crop residues after harvest. This process is commonly used in many agricultural regions around the world to clear fields of post-harvest debris and prepare for the next planting season. However, this practice can have significant negative impacts on air quality and the environment.
One of the primary effects of agricultural burning is the release of air pollutants such as particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and carbon monoxide (CO) into the atmosphere. These pollutants can have serious health effects on both humans and animals. For example, PM can cause respiratory problems, while NOx and SO2 can cause acid rain, which can damage crops, forests, and water bodies.
In addition to the direct health impacts, agricultural burning can also contribute to climate change. The burning of crop residues releases large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere, which contributes to the greenhouse effect and global warming. This is particularly problematic in regions where agricultural burning is widespread, as it can contribute significantly to local and regional air pollution and climate change.The effects of agricultural burning on air pollution The effects of agricultural burning on air pollution
The effects of agricultural burning on air pollution
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow