The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation
High-stakes testing refers to assessments that have significant consequences for students, teachers, and schools. These consequences can include grade promotion, graduation, college acceptance, and teacher evaluations, among others. The use of high-stakes testing has become increasingly popular in education systems worldwide as a way to measure student learning and hold schools accountable for academic performance.
While high-stakes testing may have some benefits, such as ensuring that students are meeting academic standards, it can also have negative effects on student motivation. Here are some of the effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation:
Anxiety and Stress
High-stakes testing can cause anxiety and stress in students. This can be particularly true for students who struggle with test-taking, have test anxiety, or are not confident in their abilities. Anxiety and stress can lead to decreased motivation, which can result in lower test scores.
Narrow Curriculum
In some cases, high-stakes testing can lead to a narrow curriculum that focuses only on testable material. This can leave students feeling unmotivated and disengaged from their learning because they are not being exposed to a wide range of subjects and ideas.
Pressure to Perform
When there are high stakes attached to a test, students may feel pressure to perform well, even if they are not interested in the subject matter or do not see the value in the test. This pressure can lead to decreased motivation and lower test scores.
Teaching to the Test
High-stakes testing can encourage teachers to teach to the test, rather than focusing on broader learning objectives. This can lead to a lack of creativity and innovation in the classroom, which can make learning less engaging and exciting for students.
Lack of Autonomy
When high-stakes testing is the primary measure of success, students may feel like they have no control over their own learning. This lack of autonomy can lead to decreased motivation and disengagement from learning.
Negative Self-Perception
High-stakes testing can have a negative impact on students’ self-perception. If a student performs poorly on a high-stakes test, they may begin to doubt their abilities and feel less motivated to learn in the future.
Overall, high-stakes testing can have negative effects on student motivation. When students feel anxious, stressed, or pressured to perform, they may lose their intrinsic motivation to learn. Additionally, a narrow curriculum, teaching to the test, and a lack of autonomy can all contribute to decreased motivation and engagement in learning. Therefore, it is important for educators and policymakers to consider these effects when implementing high-stakes testing and to prioritize student motivation and engagement in learning.
The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow