The effects of littering on pollution
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The effects of littering on pollution
Littering is the act of disposing of waste in places other than designated waste disposal locations such as trash cans or recycling bins. Litter can include items such as food wrappers, plastic bags, cigarette butts, and other materials. The effects of littering on pollution are significant and widespread, impacting both the environment and human health.
One of the most visible effects of littering is the aesthetic pollution that it creates. Littered streets, parks, and beaches are not only unsightly but also make people feel unsafe and uncomfortable. Litter can also accumulate in bodies of water, such as rivers, lakes, and oceans, which can harm aquatic life and disrupt the balance of ecosystems.
In addition to aesthetic pollution, littering has significant environmental impacts. Littered items such as plastic bags, food wrappers, and beverage containers can take years or even decades to decompose. As these materials break down, they release toxic chemicals and pollutants into the environment. For example, plastic bags and other plastics can break down into microplastics, which can be ingested by wildlife and even enter the food chain. This can have devastating effects on ecosystems and wildlife populations.
Littering also contributes to air pollution. Burning litter, especially plastic, releases harmful chemicals into the air, including carbon monoxide, dioxins, and other hazardous air pollutants.
The effects of littering on pollution
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow