The ethics of animal testing
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The ethics of animal testing
The ethics of animal testing is a controversial topic that has been debated for many years. While some people argue that animal testing is necessary for scientific and medical research, others believe that it is unethical and cruel.
Those who support animal testing argue that it is necessary to develop and test new treatments and drugs for humans. Animal testing allows researchers to observe the effects of a substance on a living organism, which can provide valuable information about its safety and efficacy.
On the other hand, opponents of animal testing argue that it is cruel and inhumane to subject animals to painful and potentially lethal experiments. They argue that animals have the right to live without unnecessary suffering and that it is wrong to use them for human benefit.
There are also concerns about the validity of animal testing results, as some researchers argue that animals do not always respond to substances in the same way that humans do. This can lead to false positives or negatives, which can be dangerous if a drug or treatment is approved based on inaccurate results.
Overall, the ethics of animal testing is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of both the potential benefits and harms. While animal testing may be necessary in some cases, efforts should be made to minimize the harm to animals and to explore alternative methods of research whenever possible.
The ethics of animal testing
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow