The evolution of sensory systems
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The evolution of sensory systems
Sensory systems have evolved over billions of years, starting from simple receptor cells in primitive organisms to complex sensory organs in more advanced species. The evolution of sensory systems has been driven by the need to sense and respond to the environment for survival and reproduction.
In the earliest organisms, such as bacteria, the ability to detect chemical signals in their environment allowed them to move towards nutrients and away from toxins. As organisms became more complex, they developed more specialized sensory organs, such as the light-sensitive eyes of jellyfish and the olfactory organs of fish.
Vertebrates, including humans, have developed complex sensory systems that allow them to perceive a wide range of stimuli in their environment, including light, sound, touch, taste, and smell. These systems are made up of specialized sensory organs, such as the eyes, ears, and nose, that detect and process sensory information.
The evolution of sensory systems has also been shaped by the development of the brain. As the brain evolved, it became increasingly capable of processing and integrating sensory information, leading to more complex behaviors and cognitive abilities.
Overall, the evolution of sensory systems has been a gradual process driven by the need to sense and respond to the environment for survival and reproduction. As organisms continue to evolve, their sensory systems will likely become even more sophisticated and specialized, allowing them to adapt to new environments and challenges.
The evolution of sensory systems
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|