Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Here is a rough outline for how your 1000-word paper might be structured. This is my suggestion, but I welcome innovation( you don’t have to do it this way). And humor. If you are funny, please be funny.
Page 1: Introduction (draw in your reader here to connect them to the topic) and thesis (what you will prove in this paper), background info including a short summary of your “something” and why you selected it.
Page 2: Your summary and analysis of article 1. What do you agree with and why? What do you disagree with and why? How does this support your thesis?
Page 3: Your summary and analysis of article 2. Your summary and analysis of article 1. What do you agree with and why? What do you disagree with and why? How does this support your thesis?
Page 4: How has your sense of this something be affected or altered since you began working on this topic? I want to know what makes this things strangeness important or interesting in the world of other strange things AND what makes it compelling in our normal day-to-day world. Lastly, what research should be done next given your findings here?
My Something: The Haunting of Hill House.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |