The impact of globalization on cultural diversity
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The impact of globalization on cultural diversity
Globalization has had both positive and negative impacts on cultural diversity. On the positive side, globalization has facilitated the exchange of ideas, information, and goods between different cultures, leading to a greater understanding and appreciation of different cultures. This has led to the emergence of a global culture that incorporates elements from different cultures.
However, globalization has also led to the homogenization of cultures, as the dominant culture of the West has spread around the world, leading to the erosion of local cultures. This has been particularly true in developing countries, where the spread of Western culture has been most pronounced. As a result, traditional cultural practices and languages have been lost, and local communities have become more homogenous.
In addition, globalization has led to the dominance of multinational corporations, which promote a consumer culture that prioritizes materialism over traditional cultural values. This has led to a loss of cultural diversity, as people become more focused on acquiring material possessions rather than preserving their cultural heritage.
Overall, the impact of globalization on cultural diversity is complex and multifaceted, with both positive and negative consequences. While globalization has facilitated greater cultural exchange and understanding, it has also led to the homogenization of cultures and the erosion of local traditions and languages.
The impact of globalization on cultural diversity
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|