The impact of globalization on income inequality
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The impact of globalization on income inequality
Globalization has had a significant impact on income inequality worldwide. While it has created opportunities for growth and development, it has also led to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, leaving many behind. Here are some ways in which globalization has contributed to income inequality:
Wage stagnation: Globalization has increased competition for jobs, resulting in lower wages for workers in developed countries. This has led to a widening gap between the rich and the poor.
Outsourcing: Multinational companies have moved production to countries with lower labor costs, resulting in job losses in developed countries. This has contributed to a decline in the middle class and a rise in inequality.
Capital mobility: Globalization has made it easier for capital to move across borders, leading to the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few individuals and corporations.
Trade liberalization: The opening up of markets has enabled multinational corporations to dominate the global economy, leading to a decline in small businesses and a rise in inequality.
Tax avoidance: Globalization has enabled multinational corporations to avoid taxes by shifting profits to low-tax countries, depriving governments of revenue that could be used to reduce inequality.
Overall, globalization has contributed to rising income inequality by creating winners and losers in the global economy. While it has brought benefits to some, it has also left many behind, and the challenge is to address these inequalities in a sustainable and equitable manner.
The impact of globalization on income inequality
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow