The Liquidity Ratio of Delta Discussion Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Liquidity Ratio of Delta Discussion Assignment
Q4Delta has a lower debt ratio than its industry norm Alfa has a higher ratio relative to its industry. Both companies exceed modestly their industry norm with respect to interest coverage. The lower debt-to-equity ratio and higher interest coverage for Alfa’s industry suggests that its industry might have more business risk than the industry of which Delta is a part.
The liquidity ratio of Delta is higher than the industry norm, whereas that for Alfa is lower than the industry norm. Although all three financial ratios for Alfa are better than are those for Delta, they are lower relative to the industry norm. Finally, the bond rating of Delta is much better than is that of Alfa, being an Aa grade and higher than the industry norm.
The bond rating of Alfa is one grade below the very lowest grade for investment-grade bonds. It is also lower than the typical company’s bond rating in the industry. If the industry norms are reasonable representations of underlying business and financial risk, we would say that Alfa had the greater degree of risk.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Liquidity Ratio of Delta Discussion Assignment
The Liquidity Ratio of Delta Discussion Assignment