The Literature Review And Finding The Gaps
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Literature Review And Finding The Gaps
Assessment Information
Subject Code: BUS606
Subject Name: Literature Review for Master of Business Research Project
Assessment Title: Assessment 2 – Literature review
Weighting: 35 %
Total Marks: Length:
35 2500 (not including reference list)
Due Date: Submission due Week 9 – Sunday at 11.59 pm
COURSE: Master of Business (Research)
Unit: Business Research Proposal and Literature Review
Unit Code: BUS606
Type of Assessment:
Assessment 2 – Literature review
Unit Learning Outcomes addressed:
(a) Demonstrate an advanced ability to initiate and prepare an original research proposal.
(b) Demonstrate an advanced ability to prepare a literature review based on the support of an original research proposal.
(c) Demonstrate a critical appreciation of the ethical issues associated with an original research proposal and their implications for the research and the acceptability of the research by an ethics review committee.
(d) Critically evaluate the coherence, relevance and methodological merits of a given body of literature.
(e) Demonstrate a critical understanding of the theoretical, practical and professional contexts and significance of the research.
(f) Prepare a literature review that identifies and discriminates between concepts, issues, key findings and relevant theories most pertinent to the research proposal which the review supports.
Criteria for Assessment:
Knowledge and understanding Content and exploration of theories and ideas Analysis, synthesis and critical engagement Technical skills and referencing
Assessment Task:
Students are required to submit a literature review for their chosen project Your literature review should be shaped by your argument and should seek to establish your theoretical orientation, along with your methodological choices. Your literature review needs to conclude with what you have demonstrated as a ‘need for research’ in the area. This is the primary statement for the justification of the research project. The literature review needs to be organized with sub-headers in a meaningful manner based on your research topic. The language used in a literature review is often evaluative and demonstrates your perspectives of the literature in relation to your research question. Your ‘voice’ or your perspective, position or standpoint, should be identifiable in the literature review. It is important that, firstly, your theoretical position is clearly and strongly stated and that your critical evaluations are an integral part of this document. Secondly, it important that your language indicates your own or other writers’ attitudes to the research question. The literature review always ends with a research question that will be the focus of the Master of Business Research thesis. You should follow the outline below: Title of literature review: In not more than 12 words state the title of your proposed research project and literature review Research Cluster: Identify the Research Cluster aligned to your research project
Cluster 1: Leadership and Management of Large Corporations
Cluster 2: Leadership and Management of Not-for Profit Organisations
Cluster 3: Leadership and Management of Start-ups, SMEs and Family Business
Cluster 4: Leadership and Management of Technological and Digital Transformation Cluster 5: Leadership and Management of Sustainable Business Operations
Cluster 6: Leadership and Management of Government and Multilateral Organisations
Cluster 7: Leadership and Management of Tourism and Hospitality Organisations
Introduction Provide an overview of the literature review. Indicate the objectives of the literature review.
Literature review Use relevant headings and sub-headings to organize your literature review. Conclusion Your conclusion should provide a summary of the literature and show the gaps in the literature to be addressed by the research project, the proposed methods to be used and the expected contribution to the field of research from undertaking the research project.
Submission Date: Week 9 (online submission).
Total Mark & Weighting:
35 marks | 35%
Students are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved extension or approved extenuating circumstances incur a 5% penalty per
calendar day, calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 15 will incur a 1.75 mark penalty
per calendar day.
Marking rubrics Criteria
HD (High Distinction) 85%-100%
DN (Distinction) 75%-84%
CR (Credit) 74%-65%
P (Pass) 50%-64%
F (Fail) 0%-49%
Knowledge and
understanding
5 marks
Command of the
topic, unusual
creat ivity,
perception and
insight, all
suggesting that
work should be
published in an
academic forum.
Demonstrates
command of the
topic by showing
creativity,
perception and
insight — a
serious
contribut ion to
the academic
debate.
Demonstrates a
well- informed
understanding of
the topic by
showing
creativity and
insight — a
serious
contribution to
the academic
debate.
Understanding
of contemporary
academic
debate, with
some
creative input and
insight, with a
tendency toward
description.
Limited/poor
understanding
demonstrated. Any
creative input is
somewhat off the
point.
Content and
exploration of theories
and ideas
10 marks
Outstanding
selection that
makes a
substantial
contribution to
academic
debate.
Outstanding
select ion from a
wide relevant and
innovative range
of perspectives
and sources.
Selection from a
wide and
relevant range
of perspectives
and sources
that draws
upon
contemporary
academic
debate.
Relevant selection
from a range of
perspectives
and sources.
Sources are
mostly
integrated into
the overall
argument.
Narrow selection,
minimal use of
sources, to support the
argument.
Analysis,
synthesis and critical engagement 15 marks
Outstanding use
of source
material.
Excellent
argument that is
of the highest
academic quality.
Sources very
well integrated
into the overall
argument. Clear
well
structured
argument that is
well crafted and
Sources well-
integrated into
the overall
argument.
Clear, cogent
and well-
structured
Mostly clear,
cogent and well-
structured
argument.
Demonstrates
crit icality and
Sources are not
properly integrated
into the argument.
Absence of clear
and cogent
argument.
Incomplete analysisCritical distance
and outstanding
analysis of the
question, to a
high degree of
excellence.
cogent. Crit ical
distance and
outstanding
analysis of the
question.
argument.
Critical
distance and sound
analysis of the question.
general ly good
analysis.
with a tendency to
accept the source
material at face
value.
Technical skills
and referencing
5marks
Referencing
impeccable
using
appropriate
conventions.
No errors in
grammar or
spelling.
Referencing clear
and accurate using
appropriate
conventions.
Virtually no errors in
grammar or
spelling.
Referencing
clear and
accurate
using
appropriate
conventions. Good grammar and spelling.
Referencing
sufficiently clear
and using an
appropriate
convention.
Adequate
grammar and
spelling.
References
limited/inappropriate.
Many errors in
grammar and
spelling, making it
difficult or impossible
to read.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!