The Military Decision-Making Process
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Military Decision-Making Process
How do humans seek to understand themselves? What avenues do they use to do this, and are they happier or healthier when they understand their own personality and needs? Why or why not?
25
In reference to Developing a Tabletop Training Exercise for my Final Project Palacios, TX Community?
My team will take a methodical approach to developing a simulated hybrid table top training exercise, to better prepare the virtual community of Palacios, TX in terms of mitigating, responding to, and recovering from a category 5 flooding incident in the standard metropolitan statistical area (SMSA) of Palacio, TX. (Laureate Education, 2013c; Cityof palacios, n.d.)
What are the Primary Training Objectives?
One of the main training objectives is to uncover and correct deficiencies in our emergency response plans before the actual incident as oppose to afterwards, (Laureate Education, 2013c). After conducting a series of planning meetings with Palacios TX, officials, and public safety personnel in the surrounding areas, (Laureate Education, 2013c; Cityof palacios, n.d.). Will conduct a tabletop exercise designed to prevent, mitigate, and recovery from a flood or other water-related disasters, (Laureate Education, 2013c; Cityof palacios, n.d.).
One of the tools we plan to use is the military decision making process (MDMP) (Au.Af. Mil, n.d.). This is a great tool for war gaming and conducting table top exercise on flooding/water-hazards types of disaster’s, (Laureate Education, 2013c; AU.Af.Mil, n.d.). The exercise will consist of table top replica of the city and surrounding areas of Palacios, TX, (Laureate Education, 2013c; Cityof palacios, n.d.).
The key players are as follows; (1) Emergency management response team of the city and standard metropolitan statistical area (SMSA) of Palacios, (2) The police and fire chiefs, along with other city leaders, (3) Non-profit’s like the Red Cross, Salvation Army, and similar supporting agencies, (4) Transportation organizations, trucking, buses, and airports in the SMSA, of Palacios, TX, (5) Various churches, sheltering facilities, and large venues that might be employed to houses large groups of people who might be victims of a flooding disasters, (6) Hospitals, mental health professional and other allied healthcare clinicians, (7) FEMA and local, state, and other funding sources(Laureate Education, 2013c; Cityof palacios, n.d. , Roberts, 2006).
A study by Gourley et al. (2014) “on evaluation of the past, present, and future tools for radar-based flash-flood prediction,” (p.1377) offered some superb suggestions on mitigation measures and preparedness about flooding and hydrological emergencies. This was a great discussion question and I will be looking forward to reading and responding to your posts.
References:
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/army/fm101-5_mdmp.pdf
TheMilitaryDecision-MakingProcess
Gourley, J. J., Flamig, Z. L., Hong, Y., & Howard, K. W. (2014). Evaluation of past, present, and future tools for radar-based flash-flood prediction in the USA. Hydrological Sciences Journal/Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 59(7), 1377-1389. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.919391
Department of Homeland Security. (April, 2013). Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). Retrieved from: http://www.nmdhsem.org/uploads/files/HSEEP_Revision_Apr13_Final.pdf
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012f). Preparedness: Training and exercises [Video]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Roberts, P. S. (2006). FEMA After Katrina. Policy Review, (137), 15-33.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Military Decision-Making Process