Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The Right to Health Care Scenario is being debated.
Reflections: Double-check that you’re using the correct APA format. This comprises a title page at the start and a reference page at the end of the document. Each page should have a running head and a page number at the top. Remember to cite your sources both within the text and on your reference page at the end. Make sure you’re familiar with the assignment’s criteria so you know exactly what to expect. It is critical that you comprehend the assignment’s requirements. Make sure to show that you comprehend the essential topics by contrasting opposing viewpoints and citing supporting data. Using other materials can help you demonstrate that you understand the subjects being discussed. Finally, pay attention to your grammar and language. Make certain that your content is clear and easy to comprehend. The writing center can review your paper before you submit it, ensuring that you receive the highest possible grade.
In your Reflection Papers, make sure you answer the following questions:
1)What are the main points of disagreement on this subject?
2)What side of the debate (position) do you take on this issue?
3)What are the strong points on the opposing side of this debate?
Outside resources should be used to help both sides.
4)What were the three most essential takeaways from the discussion?
5)Which ethical theory (out of the six approved Kant, Act Utilitarianism, Rule Utilitarianism, Care Ethics, Virtue Ethics, and Social Contract) would you use to justify your position on this topic? Give a detailed explanation. a total of 250 words
First, identify the debate’s essential terminology (for example, clarify what Euthanasia/Abortion/Stem Cell/Public Health/PreNatal Testing/Animal Research/Health Care, etc. means and what the different varieties are based on the topic you’re addressing).
Define and explain the ethical theory you choose (prove to me that you understand what the theory is and what it does in your own words).
Present both pro and con evidence, and then explain how using your ethical theory is the best approach to decide whether or not your position is truly ethical.
Finally, any last views and opinions should be expressed here.
2 pages of APA formatted text with 2 references
The arguments between two doctors, as well as the topic of dispute they are debating about, will be saved in files.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
The Right to Health-Care Scenario is being debated |
The Right to Health-Care Scenario is being debated