The role of technology in urban farming
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The role of technology in urban farming
Urban farming refers to the practice of cultivating, processing, and distributing food within or around a city. Technology has played a significant role in making urban farming more efficient and productive. In this response, I will discuss the various ways technology has influenced and transformed urban farming.
Firstly, technology has enabled urban farmers to use space more efficiently. With limited space in urban areas, vertical farming has become increasingly popular. Vertical farming uses a series of stacked layers to grow crops in a controlled environment, using LED lights and hydroponics. This technology has the potential to increase crop yields and reduce water usage, making it an attractive option for urban farmers. In addition, there are automated systems that can regulate temperature, humidity, and nutrient levels in the growing environment, resulting in optimal growing conditions for the plants.
Secondly, technology has made it possible to monitor and manage crops remotely. With sensors and IoT devices, farmers can monitor environmental conditions and plant growth in real-time, and receive alerts when there are deviations from the desired parameters. This means that farmers can quickly respond to any issues, such as pests or disease, before they spread and cause significant damage to the crops. Furthermore, with data analysis and machine learning, farmers can predict crop yields and make informed decisions about the use of resources such as water and fertilizer.
Thirdly, technology has facilitated the creation of urban farming communities. With social media and online platforms, urban farmers can connect with each other, share ideas, and exchange resources. This community building can lead to increased knowledge sharing, reduced costs, and improved access to markets. There are also online tools that help urban farmers track and manage their crops, as well as share their progress and products with potential customers.
Fourthly, technology has made it possible to recycle and reuse waste products in urban farming. For instance, organic waste from households and businesses can be converted into compost, which can be used to fertilize plants. Similarly, waste heat from buildings can be used to power greenhouses, reducing energy consumption and costs. There are also systems that can capture and filter rainwater, reducing the reliance on municipal water supplies.
Lastly, technology has increased the accessibility and availability of fresh produce in urban areas. With the rise of e-commerce and online shopping, consumers can order fresh produce directly from urban farmers and have it delivered to their doorstep. This eliminates the need for long supply chains, reducing transportation emissions and ensuring that the produce is fresh and of high quality. Additionally, there are apps that connect consumers with urban farmers, making it easier for people to locate and purchase fresh produce.
In conclusion, technology has transformed urban farming in numerous ways. From vertical farming to remote monitoring and management, from community building to waste recycling, and from increased accessibility to fresh produce, technology has enabled urban farming to become more efficient, productive, and sustainable. As urbanization continues to increase, the role of technology in urban farming is likely to become even more significant in the years to come.
The role of technology in urban farming
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow