The Social Life of a Sidewalk Discussion Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Social Life of a Sidewalk Discussion
Final Examination “The Social Life of a Sidewalk”
DUE DATE: Friday, December 10, 2021 at 11:59 pm
To complete this final examination, you must watch the film, “Sidewalk” that is uploaded on Blackboard. You must also review the power point regarding Jane Jacobs and watch the associated video on blackboard as well as the ones embedded in the Power Point.
- Why were the booksellers allowed to set up tables on the street and sell books and magazines, when it was illegal to set up a table and sell food or clothing?
- Why did the City Council pass new laws to restrict the sale of books on the street? What did the booksellers have to do to comply with the new law?
- Jane Jacobs wrote about “public characters” in her book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961). What is a “public character”? How does the concept of “public characters” relate to the film?
- What is the “broken windows” theory? How does it relate to what the film? What are your own thoughts about this theory?
- Please watch this YouTube video: https://youtu.be/aNoHcUnJ2aU
- There is an article in the Learning Web folder, “Sidewalk”, but you can find it online here: http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2015/01/economist- explains-18
- Cornel West believes that the filmmakers and the author of the book Sidewalk should have explored the “West Indian dimension.” In a couple of sentences, explain what he is talking about.
Note: His discussion is in a minute supplementary video on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idf-IT3qlfk
- Discuss in detail how the film Sidewalk engages core social science concepts like race, poverty, homelessness, underground economies, interactions with the police, and community support networks? How does this film relate to the concepts that we discussed in class?
- What does the Sidewalk film tell you about homelessness and survival?
- What was your take away from the film and also from the work of Jane Jacobs?
- How would you define sidewalk economics? Are people who on the street a sign of a neighborhood in decay? Please reference information gathered from the film and Jane Jacobs as well.
- Discuss the stereotypes that exist about people who work on the street? Are these stereotypes accurate or inaccurate? Please explain in detail. Is street bending characterized by immorality or is there a sense of morality among street vendors? Please explain
- Discuss how people commonly stigmatized by and excluded from traditional society on the basis of their race and class struggle to define moral standards and to live according to those standards. Who defines and sets these moral standards?
- Many politicians, with the support of their constituencies, believe that they can eliminate such “troublesome” people working on the sidewalk simply by enacting more and more laws that make it difficult for these individuals to earn a living. The impulse is to crack down on panhandlers, reduce sidewalk space available to vendors, and criminalize homelessness. What is your opinion of this approach? What are the weaknesses of this approach?
- What is an “honest living”? What type of work do you believe qualifies as one making an “honest living” and why?
- Does “street work” lead to social cohesion or does it lead a society or community that’s fundamentally hostile to street workers and thus see them as a part of the solution to social evils, not the root of the problem? Please explain your answer.
- After taking this class, what do you believe is the key to politicians effectively addressing the symptoms of social problems discussed in this class? What are they getting wrong? If you were the advisor to lawmakers, how would you suggest that they tackle these issues? Which issues would you prioritize and why?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results