Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The Thylacinid Analysis Paper’s Physical Characteristics
1) Describe the thylacine’s natural history and distinct physical qualities. What did it eat, where did it live, and how did it look? What were the reasons or factors that contributed to their extinction?
2) Based on the options given in the lecture, what do you think could have been done to prevent the thylacine’s extinction? Is there any predator today that is being wiped out because of man’s fear and ignorance? hint: they’re an American species that’s only recently arrived in the Northern Rockies. Conduct a Google search and compose an essay regarding the current issue. Who is it, where is it, and why is it happening?
3) Compare and contrast the works of John Audubon and Walton Ford. How do their aesthetics and content reflect the eras in which they lived? What does Walton Ford hope to express about previous artists and society through his work?
4) Discuss your ideas on the theory that the world is on the verge of a sixth mass extinction. Explain what the 6th mass extinction means. Why should we be concerned?
The Thylacinid Analysis Paper’s Physical Characteristics
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
The Thylacinid Analysis Paper’s Physical Characteristics |
The Thylacinid Analysis Paper’s Physical Characteristics