Thinking Strategically About Your Career Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Thinking Strategically About Your Career Assignment
Please see the attache picture
– Summarize the results received from the test
– Answer the following questions:
– What aptitudes are aligned with my current career? Support your answer.
– What aptitudes are not well aligned with my current career?
– What actions could I take to ensure the best possible alignment between my aptitudes and my current career / desired career?
– Read the HBR article ‘Think Strategically About Your Career’
Thinking Strategically About Your Career Assignment
– Consider your current resume and the resume you will need to have 5 years from now. What are the most important 5 changes that need to happen? How will you make sure those 5 things are put into place?
– Responses should comprise two pages. The first should cover the test summary and the related questions (one paragraph per question, list each question you are answering). The second should cover your response to the resume question (one paragraph for each change and action).
– Grades will be based on completeness of responses, graduate level communication skills, proper APA reference use and evidence of logic reasoning.
https://hbr.org/2016/12/think-strategically-about-your-career-development
https://www.123test.com/report/KXGGJ48URLAF
Thinking Strategically About Your Career Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Thinking Strategically About Your Career Assignment