Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Exercise Review #2
This assignment has three parts. Please follow the directions below. Please upload your paper here (be aware that the only formats that are accepted here are: .doc, .docx, .pdf).
Part 1 – Exercise: Identify another deviant group that would present research challenges similar to the study of the world of drug dealing and smuggling that Patricia Adler talks about in her chapter. Make a point by point comparison of the stages and roles field research into such additional settings would entail (ex: getting in, the covert role, developing trust, the overt role, cross-checking, and problems and issues). A simple explanation two to three sentences of each stage is fine. This section should be no more than one double-spaced page.
Part 2 Link it up: You will be responsible for finding a conceptual link from your identified group (above) to a real life example. For example, lets say youre interested in doing research on far-right or another extremist group (Think Hunter S. Thompson!), find an example and provide a brief review of it. Examples can go beyond peer reviewed journal articles for this exercise, and can even include alternative media sources such as documentaries, movies, and other media – but please stay away from simple news stories. Like with the last exercise, this portion should be written in brief format. It must contain the following sections: 1) the source (cite the source using APA style to the best of your ability if youre using an alternate source); 2) what the main question(s)/point(s) is/are and how it relates to your topic (a paragraph or two); 3) a brief description of the research methodology, if any (e.g. interviews or observations, the who, what, when, where, etc.; three to four sentences will likely do here) if there is no observable methodology, youll have to add a bit on to the previous section; and, 4) an overview of the findings and/or conclusions (probably a couple paragraphs). This part of your assignment should be no less than a page and a half and no more than two pages, double spaced.
Part 3 – Reflection: This is your opportunity to reflect and share your thoughts and opinions on your chosen topic. There is no right or wrong answer here – I would just like to provide you the opportunity to share any insight, thoughts, opinions, and questions, you might have. This section should be between three-quarters and one-page in length.
In all, the written portion of this assignment, which you will upload here, should be no less than three to no more than four pages in length, double spaced. Please use 12pt Times New Roman font and standard 1″ margins. Please note: efforts to make more look less or less look more will negatively impact your grade.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Three part assignment paper