Top Layer of the Grand Canyon Discussion
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
please respond to this prompt with the following information:
Paragraph 1:
PAY ATTENTION: HOW MUCH TIME IS REPRESENTED FROM THE TOP OF THE GRAND CANYON TO THE BOTTOM?
APPLY YOUR KNOWLEDGE: WHAT PRINCIPLE OF STRATIGRAPHY IS DEMONSTRATED AT THE GRAND CANYON?
NAME AT LEAST 1 ENVIRONMENT THAT USED TO CHARACTERIZE ARIZONA. WHAT EVIDENCE DO WE HAVE FOR THAT ENVIRONMENT?
Paragraph 2:
Choose another segment from this program (Clips 3-16).
WHICH SEGMENT DID YOU WATCH?
WHAT DID THE CLIP HELP YOU UNDERSTAND BETTER?
WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS CLIP TO YOUR CLASSMATES?
After the prompt please reply to the TWO other posts with the following content :
Fact-check their first paragraph. Do you agree with the information they posted? Is there anything they misunderstood, left out, or could improve upon in their answers?
Would you be interested in watching the extra segment they watched, regardless of whether they recommend it? Why or why not?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Top Layer of the Grand Canyon Discussion
Top Layer of the Grand Canyon Discussion