Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Transformational Leadership Styles Assignment
Home
About us
Self-assessment tests
Virtual seminars
News
Courses
Contact us
Resources
Links
Career Development – Test One Results – What is your leadership style? The result of the test is as follows: Your main preference is using transformational leadership styles
To find out more about Transformational Leadership, click here To find out more about Transactional Leadership, click here To find out more about Laissez Faire Leadership, click here
About Leadership Styles
Transformational
Your Tranformational leadership score is 73 out of a possible 80.
Transformational leadership style is made up of 4 elements:
· Idealized influence (II) describes leaders who are exemplary role models for team members. Leaders with idealized influence can be trusted and respected by others to make good decisions for the organization.
· Inspirational motivation (IM) describes leaders who motivate others to commit to the vision of the organization. Leaders with inspirational motivation encourage the team to reach new heights in service delivery.
· Intellectual Stimulation (IS) describes leaders who encourage innovation and creativity through challenging the normal beliefs or views of a group. Leaders with intellectual stimulation promote critical thinking and problem solving to make the organization better.
· Individual consideration (IC) describes leaders who act as coaches and advisors to their team. Leaders with individual consideration encourage others to reach goals that help both them and the organization.
Your II score is 19 Your IM score is 18 Your IS score is 17 Your IC score is 19
Like the other styles, transformational leadership styles is not always appropriate. It is most successful when used with highly skilled or experienced team members, when implementing large-scale changes or resolving individual or group problems.
The transformational leadership style is most effective when:
· you want others to share in decision-making and problem-solving duties
· you want to provide opportunities for team members to develop a high sense of personal growth and job satisfaction.
· there is a large or complex problem that requires lots of different inputs to solve.
· changes must be made or problems solved that affect large numbers of people
· you want to encourage team building and participation.
Transformational leadership may not be appropriate when:
· there is not enough time to get everyone’s input
· it’s easier and more cost-effective for the manager to make the decision.
· there is a short-term crisis
Transactional
Your Transactional leadership score is 60 out of a possible 80.
Transactional leadership style is made up of 2 elements:
· Contingent Reward (CR) describes leaders who provide rewards if, and only if, team members perform adequately and/or try hard enough. It contracts exchange of rewards for effort, promises rewards for good performance, recognizes accomplishments
· Management by exception (active) (MBEa) describes leaders who do not seek to change the exsiting working methods or team members so long as performance goals are met. The leader only intervenes if something is wrong. In this case, it is “active,” where the leader monitors the situation to anticipate problems.
Your CR score is 30 Your MBEA score is 30
Sometimes transactional leadership is the most effective style to use. These situations can include:
· dealing with new team members who do not know which tasks to perform or which procedures to follow
· supervision based on detailed orders and instructions
· when team members do not respond to any other leadership style
· there is little time to make decisions
Transactional leadership style may not be appropriate when:
· team members are demoralised, stressed or demotivated
· team members expect to have their opinions heard
· others begin depending on their leader to make all their decisions
Laissez Faire
Your Laissez-faire leadership score is 30 out of a possible 80.
Laissez faire leadership style is made up of 2 elements:
· Laissez-Faire (LF) where the leader exercises little control over their team, leaving them to sort out their roles and tackle their work on their own. This approach can leave the team floundering with little direction or motivation.
· Management by exception (passive) (MBEp) describes leaders who do not seek to change the exsiting working methods or team membersso long as performance goals are met. The leader only intervenes if something is wrong. In this case, it is “passive,” where the leader does nothing until a problem or mistake has actually occurred.
Your MBEP score is 12 Your LF score is 18
Laissez faire may be an effective style to use when:
· team members are highly skilled, experienced, and educated
· team members have pride in their work and the drive to do it successfully on their own
· outside experts, such as staff specialists or consultants are being used
This style may not be appropriate when:
· it makes team members feel insecure
· the leader cannot provide regular feedback to let the teamknow how well they are doing.
· leaders are unable to thank team members for their good work.
· the leaders doesn’t understand their responsibilities and is hoping the team can cover for them
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results