Trend Micro Security Intelligence Blog
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Trend Micro Security Intelligence Blog
This assignment will be based on the following article:
Chen, J 2019 ‘Mirrorthief Group Uses Magecart Skimming Attack to Hit Hundreds of Campus Online Stores in US and Canada’, Trend Micro Security Intelligence Blog, 3 May, <https://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/mirrorthief-group-uses-magecart-skimming-attack-to-hit-hundreds-of-campus-online-stores-in-us-and-canada/>
Answer the following questions in relation to the article. Assume that the audience for your responses is senior level management, who do not have a strong technical background. The word limit for this assessment item is 1,000 words.
- Why did the adversaries encrypt the payment data using AES and encode using Base64 before exfiltration?
- The adversaries in this attack used a compromised Javascript file hosted on the webserver to cause the client to transmit the payment data to a server which the adversaries controlled. Describe two other methods the adversaries could have used to achieve the same outcome.
- The case study identifies at least three parties, PrismWeb/PrismRBS, 201 (individual) campus stores and the adversary group. Of the former two parties, who was primarily responsible for defending against this attack? What actions could the other (non-responsible) party have taken to mitigate against this type of vulnerability?
- Compare and contrast the characteristics of the attack with the Dridex Financial Trojan.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results