Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Understanding Business and Management Research Methods Essay
2000 Words (not including references)
Main Objective of the assessment
This is an individual assignment. You are required to submit a critical analysis of research topic in relation to a chosen topic of study/area of interest in the context of Business Studies. This research topic normally relates the research issues in your master programme subject area.
Description of the Assessment
You need to undertake a significant literature review, which outlines the underpinning methodologies and the research method(s) adopted in previous research that incorporates a range of viewpoints and perspectives. It is essential to provide a critical analysis that applies the knowledge and understanding acquired during the module to evaluate theoretical and technical aspects of related research methodologies and methods.
You are expected to demonstrate both breadth and depth of understanding of relevant academic literature of the chosen topic. You are required to explain, discuss and evaluate the methodologies applied in the reviewed literature.
Typically, your essay should have (a) an executive summary (b) Introduction (c) literature review (d) Analysis, discussion and evaluation of research methodology (e) Findings and what you have learnt from this assignment (f) References (Harvard Referencing System).
In this individual assignment, you are expected to use relevant materials from academic research books and academic empirical journal articles (ABS
Criterion | Grade descriptors according to: Content appropriateness of material, relevance, feasibility, quality of solutions | |||||
Knowledge
(25%) Evidence of reading in the area of Research Methods and the relevant topic understudy |
A* to A-
Excellent, Comprehensive, detailed and well organised and structured review of selected factual information on the topic understudy, with correct emphasis on the question at hand. Evidence of reading of a wide range of relevant literature sources including effective use of the reading list. Makes very good use of factual evidence to support arguments. Well sustained effective style of writing that is appropriately concise or expansive. Accurate Referencing |
B+ to B-
Very good, relevant evaluation, detailed and well organised response. Good overview of the topic understudy, and the use of factual information to address the question at hand, which is consistent and mainly error free. Evidence of effective use of the reading list with some evidence of wider reading. Competent English and fluent writing. Good referencing |
C+ to C-
Fair range of information and use of terminology but not complete and/or some errors. Limited evidence of the topic understudy, from relevant reading in the area of the topic understudy, including the reading list and/or course notes. Few grammatical errors. Limited, but adequate referencing |
D+ to D-
Mainly descriptive answer, satisfactory but not complete. Evidence of some reading, but little real research effort is shown. Some barely adequate references not well presented and not consistent. Lack of knowledge in some areas of the topic understudy, relevant to the question at hand and some factual errors. English is adequate |
E+ to E-
Work does not demonstrate evidence of understanding the question at hand and/or the wider general aspects of the topic understudy. Limited information and content, many factual errors, and/or little evidence of reading. |
F
Little or no adequate content relating to the topic understudy, few relevant facts, and/or major factual errors, too short and no evidence of reading |
ranking listed journals) in your subject area to support your analysis and arguments when formulating your assignment. Your analysis, discussion and evaluation should be backed with appropriate academic references and examples where necessary.
This assignment should be presented with 12 pt. Times New Roman Text with line spacing of 1.5. The word limit is 2000 words (excluding references). Note that assignment below this word limit by more than 10% would result in decrease in the overall achieved mark by 10%. Proper referencing of all ideas, concepts, theories and quotes used in your work is essential.
Normally you are required to present no less than 15 academic journal article references. The Harvard referencing system must be used, details of which are contained on your handbook. Failure to employ a clear and appropriate system of referencing will be penalized.
4 marking criteria all equally weighted
|
|||||||||||||||
|
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Understanding Business and Management Research Methods Essay |
Understanding Business and Management Research Methods Essay