Understanding Mutualistic Ecological Interactions Ques
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Understanding Mutualistic Ecological Interactions Ques
1. What is the overall purpose of this study? How does it relate to other mutualistic relationship studies discussed?
2. what are the two experimental treatments of seed rain and seed addiction. Generally, how are the study conducted
3. What was the set-up of this study? What are the different factors being studied?
4. What factors were the authors studying?
5. What are the biotic and abiotic factors that influence seed dispersal? What is the role of Harvester ants in Chileptin dispersal?
6. Fig.2 represents seed rain at fleshy-fruited microhabitats. What pattern is observed. What does this pattern show?
7. What does figure: 3 tell us about temporal aspect seedling development. How does this reflect the ecosystem?
8. What were the major findings of this study? How does avian dispersal affect Chileptin biodiversity? Put this question towards the end.
9. What is seed addition? How is it depicted in this study?
10. What were the main conclusions for the study? Why do the authors call it directed dispersal?
11. How important is this study in understanding the mutualistic ecological interactions
Understanding Mutualistic Ecological Interactions Ques
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Understanding Mutualistic Ecological Interactions Ques
Understanding Mutualistic Ecological Interactions Ques