Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
United States Drug Enforcement Authority
Massachusetts has specific regulations that govern the APRNs licensing to practice. According to the rules, the NPs must collaborate with medical doctors while prescribing medications under the schedule II category, such as methadone and fentanyl. These medications require careful administration because of their susceptibility to causing dependence in patients (United States Drug Enforcement Authority, n. d.). When prescribing the medicines, the professionals should indicate in the prescription form the name of the physician under whose supervision they are working. Additionally, the supervising medical expert should review patients’ charts following three consecutive prescriptions of the medication.
Massachusetts has also instigated some ground rules that guide NPs when prescribing controlled drugs, which have the potential of causing addictions and dependence. Firstly, the state’s laws forbid the professionals from prescribing the medications belonging to schedule II for themselves (United States Drug Enforcement Authority, n. d.). Subsequently, the regulations indicate that the professionals should also refrain from prescribing the medications to individuals with whom they have a close relationship, such as family members. The purpose of these rules is to ensure that controlled drugs are prescribed if and when necessary (Phoenix & Chapman, 2020). It prevents incidences of overuse or misuse of the substances such as opioids and their derivatives and naloxone that are high-risk medications because of their possibility of causing dependence.
Conclusion
APRNs perform advanced roles in the healthcare organization, including prescribing various medications that have different impacts on the body of ailing individuals. Therefore, their activities should be adequately controlled to ensure that they follow appropriate protocols while performing their roles in the clinical setting to elicit positive outcomes in the treatment process. One of their pertinent roles is prescribing various medications, including controlled drugs. To perform this role effectively, it is necessary to get prescriptive authority from the state boards that gives guidelines and restrictions on prescribing medications. Subsequently, it is essential to obtain DEA licensure that permits NPs to prescribe controlled substances while guiding them on principles to use while writing prescriptions. Moreover, it gives the limitations needed to ensure that the high-risk medications are not misused.
References
American Medical Association. (n. d.). State Law Chart: Nurse Practitioner Prescription Authority. Advocacy Resource Center. Retrieved from https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/specialty%20group/arc/ama-chart-np-prescriptive-authority.pdf
United States Drug Enforcement Authority (n. d.). The Controlled Substances Act. Retrieved from https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/csa
Phoenix, B. J., & Chapman, S. A. (2020). Effect of state regulatory environments on advanced psychiatric nursing practice. Archives of psychiatric nursing, 34(5), 370-376.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
United States Drug Enforcement Authority |
United States Drug Enforcement Authority