United States Environmental Protection Agency
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Stakeholder example EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency)
The problem:
In the currents of Tampa Bay and in many other bodies of water, microplastics pollute the environment. These small particles of plastic are then consumed by the wildlife in the area. This leaves the animal without the nutrition it needs but with a full stomach, so they die of starvation (Dalton). The waters of Tampa Bay and its surrounding area are home to many animals, including endangered species that are affected by microplastic pollution. Tampa Bay is also home to humans, who are also affected by microplastics on a daily basis.
The introduction of microplastics into the environment is a product of human behavior. The mass use of plastic in modern times leads to a mass amount of plastic pollution poured into the oceans, which breaks down and becomes microplastic. Microplastic is also intentionally used in products such as some beauty products, toothpaste, and clothing (Dalton). Those particles get washed down into the ocean and end up harming life there.
The solution
In order to combat the ever-growing presence of microplastics in Tampa Bay our proposed solution is the creation of a modified tidal barrage. A tidal barrage is a form of hydroelectric power that uses the ever flowing ocean currents kinetic energy to spin a turbine and generate electricity. But in order to do so tidal barrages block off sections of water, like a wall, and then only allow water to flow through in certain areas. We plan on putting filtration systems in the channels and using the kinetic energy of the tides for the water to be pushed through the filter and hopefully leave the microplastic residue behind to be disposed of. We intend on creating these tidal barrages at key locations around Tampa Bay as a source of renewable energy and water filtration.
Overview
Provide a brief overview for this section that includes how the included costs were chosen (e.g., because they were deemed especially important to the project, because they were deemed especially important to a specific stakeholder, etc.), what information is included for each cost (e.g. external vs internal), and how the information is organized. (~3-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
Costs Analyzed
LABOR COSTUnder each cost, include a brief description of each cost, how it is related to the project, and whether the cost is recurring/nonrecurring or internal/external. (~2-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
RENT OF THE PLACE COST ( WILL BE ON PORTS)
Under each cost, include a brief description of each cost, how it is related to the project, and whether the cost is recurring/nonrecurring or internal/external. (~2-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
DESIGN COST
Under each cost, include a brief description of each cost, how it is related to the project, and whether the cost is recurring/nonrecurring or internal/external. (~2-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
MATERIAL COST
Under each cost, include a brief description of each cost, how it is related to the project, and whether the cost is recurring/nonrecurring or internal/external. (~2-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
PRODUCTION COST
Under each cost, include a brief description of each cost, how it is related to the project, and whether the cost is recurring/nonrecurring or internal/external. (~2-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
MAINTENANCE COST
Under each cost, include a brief description of each cost, how it is related to the project, and whether the cost is recurring/nonrecurring or internal/external. (~2-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
INSTALLING COST
Under each cost, include a brief description of each cost, how it is related to the project, and whether the cost is recurring/nonrecurring or internal/external. (~2-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
PART COST ( SUCH AS THE FILTER ETC)
Under each cost, include a brief description of each cost, how it is related to the project, and whether the cost is recurring/nonrecurring or internal/external. (~2-4 sentences)
· erase this note and this bullet point prior to submitting your work
Summary
Include a summary of anticipated costs, whether the list is exhaustive, if other costs have also been identified, and reiterate why these specific costs were chosen for this report.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow United States Environmental Protection Agency
United States Environmental Protection Agency