Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Urban Sociology Discussion Essay Assignment term paper
To get things going with our new learning community, let’s start off with a cool icebreaker.
Initial Post
Please introduce yourself to the class, and me – “Hi! My name is….Talk about why you are taking this class, and what you expect to get out of it? Your major? Where do you plan to transfer to? Tell us what your dream job/career is?
Reply
Engage a fellow classmate about something that stood out to you from their post.
Discussion Tool
If you would like to know more about the Discussion tool in Canvas, you may find the following tutorials helpful:
What are Discussions? (Links to an external site.)
How do I reply to a discussion? (Links to an external site.)
Here are a few useful buttons used to reply to a post, view unread posts, and collapse/expand discussion threads:
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Urban Sociology Discussion Essay Assignment term paper |
Urban Sociology Discussion Essay Assignment term paper