US Army Futures Command Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
US Army Futures Command Case Study
Topic: Does the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversaries?
Paper details:
Argumentative Essay Development Student Guide Development of Thesis Statement Based on the readings, does the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversaries? 1. Pick a side, i.e. do you believe it does or does not enable the Army to defeat its peer adversaries. Answer this in a succinct statement. 2. Select and name three specific facts espoused in the US Army Futures Command. Write what they are below, do not describe them at this time. a. b. c. 3. Combine your answers to questions 1 and 2 in a succinct sentence.
This is your thesis statement. Development of Introductory Paragraph 4. Select a battlefield example of a modern era threat from a peer adversary, i.e. cyber warfare from Russia. Write a sentence that names the example and a single significant fact about it. 5. Why is the example worth knowing? Answer this question in a specific succinct sentence.
This is your attention step and should motivate the reader to read your essay. Remember to specifically name your example, this lends credibility. 6. Write a sentence to introduce the US Army Futures Command. Name it and state why it is noteworthy according to expert opinion, not your own. 7.
List the facts you selected (2a, b, and c) and state whether those policies would or would not address the example you chose for 4. If you are arguing the affirmative, they should address the issue; if the negative, they should not. Write a direct statement that supports the selection you made for number 1. Answer this in a complete sentence. 8. Combine sentences 4, 5, 6, 7, and 3. This is your introductory paragraph. Development of Body Paragraph One 9. Write a sentence that identifies and defines 2a. 10. Select a specific example of a threat that would fall under this policy from one of the assigned readings.
Would the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversary in this instance? Make sure this supports the choice you made for question 1. Write a sentence that describes this instance. 11. Write a sentence that states why the action is pivotal or important. 12. Write a succinct sentence that states why this threat can or cannot be addressed by 2a. Stay true to your thesis statement–this sentence ties your argument to your thesis. Development of Body Paragraph Two 13.
Write a sentence that identifies and defines 2b. 14. Select a specific example of a threat that would fall under this policy from one of the assigned readings. Would the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversary in this instance? Make sure this supports the choice you made for question 1. Write a sentence that describes this event. 15. Write a sentence that states why the action is pivotal or important. 16.
Write a concise sentence that states why this threat can or cannot be addressed by 2b. Stay true to your thesis statement–this sentence ties your argument to your thesis. Development of Body Paragraph Three 17. Write a sentence that identifies and defines 2c. 18. Select a specific example of a threat that would fall under this policy from one of the assigned readings. Would the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversary in this instance? Make sure this supports the choice you made for question 1.
Write a sentence that describes this instance. 19. Write a sentence that states why the action is pivotal or important. 20. Write a succinct sentence that states why this threat can or cannot be addressed by 2c. Stay true to your thesis statement–this sentence ties your argument to your thesis. Development of the Conclusion 21. Based on your answer to question 1, write a sentence that states whether the US Army Futures Command is adequate for the defeat of peer adversaries. 22. Write a sentence that lists the 3 specific examples you chose in 10, 14 and 18. Do not describe them. Identify that these events are threats from specific peer adversaries. 23.
Based on how you answered question 1, write a sentence that states whether the US Army Futures Command can enable or cannot enable the defeat of peer enemies in the events in 22. 24. Write a sentence that suggests the significance of this knowledge for today’s military professional. 25. Restate your thesis using different language. Do not repeat your thesis using the same sentence. 26. Combine 22-25, this is your conclusion paragraph. Instruction: Double-space the essay with one-inch margins all around (top, bottom, left, and right) in Arial font, size 12-pitch. The paper should be three-to-five typed pages, approximately 750 – 1,250 words.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results