Valuation Ratio for A Comparable Firm Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Valuation Ratio for A Comparable Firm Assignment
DFC valuation requires a large number of assumptions, while multiples valuation requires only one assumption: that the valuation ratio for a comparable firm be the same as the ratio for the target firm. Comment on this statement, using one of the multiples analyzed in the course (cash flow, earnings or sale multiple) to support your answer.
Suppose that you hold a well-diversified portfolio of stocks. Explain, in terms of variances and covariances, how one can measure the contribution of a single security to the portfolio variance.
Brealey, Myers and Allen analyses several motives for mergers and acquisitions. Please name and explain two doubtful motives and two sensible motives described by the authors.
Explain the implication of rebalancing the capital structure for the risk of tax shields.
Show the implication for the value of the company’s shares as it increases leverage, according to Modigliani and Miller Proposition 2. Explain why that happens.
Valuation Ratio for A Comparable Firm Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Valuation Ratio for A Comparable Firm Assignment
Valuation Ratio for A Comparable Firm Assignment