Vantage SD Bud Case Study Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Vantage SD Bud Case Study Discussion
Vantage SD Bud has decided to conduct cash planning for the next three months using simulation. Net cash flows (receipts minus disbursement) during the month are random variables given by the probability distribution below (where, negative values represent net cash outflows and positive values represent net cash inflows).
Net Cash Flows per Month
(RM000)………………….Probability
-1500……………………………..0.20
-1000………………………………0.40
1000………………………………0.25
1500………………………………0.15Vantage SD Bud currently has a beginning cash balance of RM200,000 (at the beginning of month 1). The firm’s required minimum cash balance, to keep on hand for future transactions, is RM150,000, determined after each month’s cash flow reconciliation.
Thus, after considering the month’s net cash flow results, if the resulting cash flow balance for the month is less than RM150,000, Vantage SD Bud will borrow sufficient funds to bring the balance up to RM150,000.
On the other hand, if the resulting balance exceeds the required RM150,000, Vantage SD Bud will repay outstanding accumulated borrowings (to the extent possible given the available cash balance in excess of RM150,000, and given the amount of accumulated borrowings outstanding). Vantage SD Bud has no accumulated borrowings currently (at the beginning of month 1).
Simulate the cash flows of Vantage SD Bud for one year and indicate the total amount borrowed during the year and how much is owed at the end of the year.
Vantage SD Bud Case Study Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Vantage SD Bud Case Study Discussion
Vantage SD Bud Case Study Discussion