Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Please go to Youtube and watch the video “1920s – Part Two (CSUDH History 101 Lecture #23).” The following is a link to the video:
https://youtu.be/1zdLvgOc8AI
The video contains four questions worth a total of 15 points. Because a few of these questions are a little more difficult, they are worth a lot of points. Please enter your responses in this box.
There is a section dedicated to music. Panopto is the recording software I use, and it doesn’t like to record music or videos. Simply go to YouTube and type in the artist’s name to hear better versions of the music I’ve included. That way, you’ll be able to hear a much better version.
Please note that the titles of two of the pictures in your Harlem Renaissance art question were mixed up. It’s time to switch Aaron Douglas, Building More Stately Mansions, and Palmer Hayden, Midsummer Night in Harlem. Thank you very much!
Please see the video below. You’ll find the question in the video, and you’ll be able to answer it only by watching the video and reading the reading that I’ve prepared for you. Please do not use any other resources.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Video Questions from the 1920s, Part 2 |
Video Questions from the 1920s, Part 2